Skip to main content

To Learn or Not to Learn: Are Children With Learning Differences Set Up for Success?

Document last updated on Thursday, June 6, 2024.

Summary

This Civil Grand Jury report is about Individual Educational Plans in Marin schools (2024).

It was issued on June 6, 2024. You can view the report as a PDF.

Responses from agencies are due on September 6, 2024 and are available below.

View the document

This document may not work with all assistive technology and is being remediated. For alternative formats, please email Heather Callan or phone 415-473-6132. To use the California relay service, dial 711.

Responses

Responding agency  Status
Marin County Superintendent of Schools Responded July 17, 2024
Bolinas-Stinson School District Board of Trustees Responded August 7, 2024
Kentfield School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Laguna Joint School District Board of Directors Response due September 6, 2024
Lagunitas School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Larkspur-Corte Madera School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Marin County Office of Education Responded July 17, 2024
Mill Valley School District Board of Trustees Responded August 9, 2024
Miller Creek Elementary School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Nicasio School District Board of Trustees Responded August 13, 2024
Novato Unified School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Reed Union School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Ross School District Board of Trustees Responded August 6, 2024
Ross Valley School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
San Rafael City Schools Board of Education Response due September 6, 2024
Sausalito/Marin City School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Shoreline Unified School District Board of Trustees Responded August 15, 2024
Tamalpais Union High School District Board of Trustees Response due September 6, 2024
Marin County SELPA Invited to respond September 6, 2024

Privacy

Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury.   

The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions of Penal Code Section 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate. 

Related

Page updated August 20, 2024